Here’s why the UK Government’s proposal to ban social media for under-16s is misinformed…

Young people have the right under article 12 of the UNCRC to access information and participate in decisions that affect them. Yet this policy proposal seems to have been developed without our voices at the table. Where are young people’s opinions informing this decision?

Young people rely on social media for more than just entertainment. It helps young people connect with others who share their interests, tackle isolation, and stay informed.

Article 17 affirms the right to access information from various sources, and research published last week from the Scottish Youth Parliament and Young Scot shows that 3 in 4 young people use social media daily or every few days to find out what’s happening in the world.

Yes, there are harmful aspects of social media that need addressing. But a rushed ban risks doing more harm than good. These effects don’t disappear when you turn 16 and young people will find ways around restrictions, which could lead to even greater risks. There has also not been enough time to fully realise the impact this policy is having in Australia.

Instead of punishing young people, why aren’t we holding tech companies accountable through regulation for their algorithms and failures to remove dangerous content?